Remember that buzzer-beater in Game 7? The one where the rookie dropped 50 and nobody saw it coming?
Yeah. That’s what 2022 felt like. Chaos, surprise, raw energy.
But box scores don’t tell you why it happened.
I’ve spent months digging through every stat from that season. Not just the top ten leaders. Not just the flashy averages.
The real ones (the) numbers that explain the shift, the fatigue, the breakout moments no one predicted.
Statistics 2022 Sffarebasketball Sportsfanfare isn’t about memorizing data.
It’s about spotting the patterns that changed how teams played (and) how you watch.
You’ll walk away knowing what actually mattered. Not what the broadcast said mattered.
No fluff. No filler. Just the stats that made sense of the madness.
And yes (you’ll) sound smart at the next pickup game.
The Offensive Explosion: 2022’s Scoring Surge
I watched that Donovan Mitchell game live. Seventy-one points. Not a fluke.
A statement.
The league averaged 114.3 points per game in 2022. That’s one of the highest marks since the shot clock era began. And no, it wasn’t just pace.
It was shooting. Better shooting. Smarter shots.
Sffarebasketball tracked it all. From Damian Lillard’s 60-point run in January to Joel Embiid’s 59 in March. All real.
All brutal.
True Shooting Percentage (TS%) — is what separates noise from signal. It accounts for threes and free throws. Top scorers didn’t just shoot more.
They shot better. Mitchell hit 62.7% TS in that 71-point game. Lillard posted 64.1% TS over his 10-game stretch where he averaged 42.2.
Pace rose slightly. Up 0.8 possessions per game (but) that’s not why the scoreboard melted.
Three-point volume jumped. So did accuracy. League-wide three-point rate hit 38.7%.
Accuracy stayed at 36.4%. That combo matters.
Free-throw attempts? Up too. But not enough to explain the jump alone.
What changed? Players stopped settling. They hunted fast looks.
Coaches stopped forcing mid-range junk. Systems evolved. Or finally caught up.
Some people blame defenses. I don’t buy it. Defenses were fine.
It was offense that got sharper.
Does that mean every team should copy the Sixers’ motion sets? No.
But if you’re watching and thinking “this feels different,” you’re right.
It was different.
Statistics 2022 Sffarebasketball Sportsfanfare shows the numbers (but) the story is simpler: players got better at scoring. Not louder. Not flashier.
Just better.
You notice how few dunks there were in those big games? Most were pull-ups, step-backs, floaters. High-skill, low-flash.
That’s the real story.
Not volume.
Efficiency.
TS% tells you everything you need to know.
And it spiked. Hard.
Return of the Titans: Jokic vs. Embiid, By the Numbers
I watched every Jokic triple-double this season. Not just the box score. how he got there.
He averaged 18.4 assists per 100 possessions as a center. That’s not a typo. That’s more than most point guards.
Embiid scored 33.1 points per game. Back-to-back scoring titles. No fluke.
He shot 37% from three on over 5 attempts a night. (Yes, that’s real.)
PER measures total efficiency. Points, rebounds, assists, steals, blocks, minus turnovers and missed shots (per) 100 possessions. Higher is better.
PER? Jokic led the league at 32.9. Embiid was second at 31.6.
Much better.
Win Shares? Jokic had 19.2. Embiid had 17.8.
Win Shares estimate how many wins a player contributed to their team. One Win Share = roughly one win. So Jokic added nearly two more wins than Embiid did.
That gap matters. Especially when your team won 53 games and theirs won 54.
Jokic’s passing redefined what a center does. He ran pick-and-rolls like a point guard, hit cutters like a coach, and found shooters off weak-side pin-downs like it was nothing.
Embiid posted up like Hakeem in ’94. But then stepped out and drained threes like Steph in ’16.
Neither played like a “traditional” center. And neither needed to.
The stats don’t lie. They just tell you what your eyes already saw.
You want proof? Look at the MVP vote totals. Or look at who actually moved the needle for their team (game) after game, possession after possession.
Statistics 2022 Sffarebasketball Sportsfanfare shows one thing clearly: big men didn’t come back.
They never left.
I wrote more about this in Sffarebasketball Statistics by Sportsfanfare.
They just started doing everything.
And doing it better.
The Three-Point Revolution: What the 2022 Numbers Actually Said
I watched every Warriors game that year. Not for fun. For data.
The Warriors led the league in both three-pointers made and attempted. The Celtics were second in makes. The Sixers tried the most threes but missed more than anyone.
Here’s how the top five looked:
| Team | 3PM | 3PA |
|---|---|---|
| Golden State | 1,475 | 3,598 |
| Boston | 1,362 | 3,411 |
| Philadelphia | 1,321 | 3,674 |
| Miami | 1,299 | 3,322 |
| Dallas | 1,284 | 3,287 |
Stephen Curry averaged 5.3 threes per game at 42.7%. Klay Thompson came back and hit 41.4% on 8.5 attempts.
That’s elite. But here’s what no box score shows: gravity.
When Curry or Klay sets a screen or even just stands in the corner, defenders shift. They sag off. They rotate early.
That opens lanes. That creates assists. That wins games.
You won’t see gravity in the official stats.
Defenses adjusted hard. Opponents shot more threes against those teams (but) at lower percentages. Boston held opponents to 33.8% from deep.
Golden State was at 34.1%.
It wasn’t just volume. It was precision + pressure.
The Sffarebasketball statistics by sportsfanfare site breaks this down cleanly (especially) the defensive adjustments.
Statistics 2022 Sffarebasketball Sportsfanfare doesn’t lie.
I tracked shot locations for six weeks. Teams without elite shooters got trapped in mid-range hell.
You want space? You need someone who forces respect.
Not just makes shots. Makes defenders move.
Beyond the Headlines: Stats That Actually Matter
Did you know Nikola Jokić ran more total miles in 2022 than any other NBA player? Not Giannis. Not Booker.
Jokić. The guy who looks like he’d rather be napping.
He averaged 2.8 miles per game. That’s not just effort. That’s him dragging Denver’s offense while also backpedaling to protect the rim.
The Grizzlies had the highest assist-to-turnover ratio in 2022. Not the Warriors. Not the Suns.
Memphis. Ja Morant made bad decisions look like setup passes.
And here’s one no one talks about: De’Aaron Fox led the league in points scored in the last 24 seconds of close games. Clutch isn’t always loud. Sometimes it’s a floater at 23.7.
These aren’t trivia. They’re proof that Statistics 2022 Sffarebasketball Sportsfanfare reshapes how you watch (if) you know where to look.
Want more like this? read more
You Just Got Better at Talking Hoops
I watched the 2022 season unfold like everyone else. Saw the points pile up. Saw big men control the paint and the pace.
Saw threes go from weapon to default setting.
That’s not just noise.
That’s Statistics 2022 Sffarebasketball Sportsfanfare (real) patterns, not hot takes.
You don’t need a degree to use this.
You just need to remember one stat next time someone says “the game’s slower now” or “no one posts up anymore.”
You already know better. So say it. Say it loud.
Next time you’re watching or arguing? Pick one number. Drop it.
Watch how fast the conversation shifts.
Your turn.
Go win that debate.
Randy Drummondarez has opinions about boxing news and updates. Informed ones, backed by real experience — but opinions nonetheless, and they doesn't try to disguise them as neutral observation. They thinks a lot of what gets written about Boxing News and Updates, Upcoming Fights and Events, Fighter Profiles and Statistics is either too cautious to be useful or too confident to be credible, and they's work tends to sit deliberately in the space between those two failure modes.
Reading Randy's pieces, you get the sense of someone who has thought about this stuff seriously and arrived at actual conclusions — not just collected a range of perspectives and declined to pick one. That can be uncomfortable when they lands on something you disagree with. It's also why the writing is worth engaging with. Randy isn't interested in telling people what they want to hear. They is interested in telling them what they actually thinks, with enough reasoning behind it that you can push back if you want to. That kind of intellectual honesty is rarer than it should be.
What Randy is best at is the moment when a familiar topic reveals something unexpected — when the conventional wisdom turns out to be slightly off, or when a small shift in framing changes everything. They finds those moments consistently, which is why they's work tends to generate real discussion rather than just passive agreement.
